March 2005

Jeffrey Hallam writes “Supreme Court Makes Federal Sentencing Guidelines Advisory” for International Law Office

Share

Since the publication of “Constitutionality of US Sentencing Guidelines is Questioned”, which examined Blakely v Washington(1) and its aftermath, the US Supreme Court issued its widely anticipated ruling regarding the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. In United States v Booker and United States v Fanfan,(2) decided on January 5 2005, the Supreme Court concluded that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines violate the Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. Since the guidelines oblige judges to examine evidence and make factual findings that may increase a defendant’s sentence above what would be permitted by a jury’s verdict alone, the court determined that mandatory application of the guidelines was unconstitutional.